Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 P3D 581 - Roussel v. State

Roussel v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Dorman v. State · Roth v. State · Drumbarger v. State · Michael v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[c]umulative error requires reversal only when the impact of errors at trial is so prejudicial that the defendant was deprived of a fair trial, even if each individual error was harmless.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “after reviewing the whole record, we are left with a definite and firm conviction that the trial court erred in its ruling.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.