Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 SO2D 19 - Dade County v. Little

Dade County v. Little’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
September 1998
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 1998

4 state decisions

2019591960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Martin v. Dade Muck Land Co. · Daniell v. Sherrill · TRUSTEES OF INTERNAL IMPROVE. FUND v. Claughton · Kerivan v. Fogal · 104 So. 2d 70 - City of Miami v. Lewis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Estoppel of the grantee of a deed, viewed generally, is of the nature of equitable estoppel rather than technical estoppel by deed, since the estoppel is not predicated primarily on the execution of a formal written instrument which cannot be denied or rebutted, but rather on the inability of a person, in the eyes of the law, to acquiesce in, and enjoy the benefits of a transaction and at the same time reject the accompanying burdens. A person cannot claim under an instrument without confirming it. He must found his claim on the whole, and cannot adopt that feature or operation which makes in his favor, and at the same time repudiate or contradict another which is counter or adverse to it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The grantee in a deed will be concluded by recitals therein limiting the quantity or extent of the interest conveyed and making reservations in favor of the grantor or third person. (emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.