115 So. 2d 880 - Abrams v. Sharp’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 1984
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Richardson v. Administrator, Etc. · Raborn v. Heard · 85 So. 2d 275 - Stroy v. Heard · 92 So. 2d 287 - Jenkins v. Heard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"An individual shall be disqualified for benefits: "(1) If the administrator finds that he has left his employment without good cause connected with his employment. * * *"”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“LSA-R.S. 23:1634 expressly provides: “§ 1634. Judicial review; procedure “* * * in any proceeding under this Section the findings of the board of review as to the facts, if supported by sufficient evidence and in the absence of fraud, shall be conclusive, and the jurisdiction of the court shall be confined to questions of law. * * *””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ellis v. Doyal
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.