State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““Further, it is well settled that war-rantless searches and seizures are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment unless the State establishes that the search or seizure falls within a recognized exception. Ex parte Hilley, 484 So.2d 485, 488 (Ala.1985). Exceptions to the warrant requirement include: 1) objects in plain view; 2) consensual searches; 3) a search incident to a lawful arrest; 4) hot pursuit or emergency situations; 5) probable cause coupled with exigent circumstances; and 6) an investigatory detention and search for weapons pursuant to Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). Ex parte Tucker, 667 So.2d 1339, 1343 (Ala.1995).””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Lee

2. “State v. Taylor , 46 So.3d 504 , 508 (Ala. Crim. App. 2010) (citing State v. Abner , 889 So.2d 52 , 53-54 (Ala. Crim. App. 2004) ); State v. Bailey , 49 So.3d 1245 , 1250 (Ala. Crim. App. 2010) (same); see also Mimms , 434 U.S. at 111 , 98 S.Ct. 330 (holding that when law-enforcement officers have legally stopped the driver of a vehicle, they may, consistent with the Fourth Amendment, order a driver out of the car for any reason or for no reason); State v. Moore , 115 So.3d 187 , 191 (Ala. Crim. App. 2012) (same). After a driver has been ordered out of an automobile,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Williams