Thomas v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Villaume v. Villaume · 351 So. 2d 1199 - Hebert v. Hebert · 846 So. 2d 692 - Bourgeois v. Kost · LaBove v. Theriot · 693 So. 2d 1229 - Stoffer v. Stoffer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On the motion of any party, a final judgment may be amended at any time to alter the phraseology of the judgment, but not its substance, or to correct errors of calculation. The judgment may be amended only after a hearing with notice to all parties, except that a hearing is not required if all parties consent or if the court or the party submitting the amended judgment certifies that it was provided to all parties at least five days before the amendment and that no opposition has been received.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Crawford v. Crawford
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.