Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

115 Tex. Crim. 147

27 S.W.2d 813

Smart v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 19, 1930

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1930-03-19

<p>The opinion states the case.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1971

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1930-03-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

¶1 The offense is burglary; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of three years.

¶2 There are no questions of law presented for review save the sufficiency of the evidence. A recital of the evidence is deemed unnecessary. The burglary was proved by the owner of the premises, and a part of the stolen property was found in the possession of the appellant. An accomplice testified, detailing the entire transaction and connecting the appellant with the commission of the offense, and the corroboration is adequate to support the conviction.

¶3 The judgment is affirmed.

¶4 Affirmed.

/115/texcrim/147 · .json · Public domain