Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 U.S. 429 - Eachus v. Broomall

Eachus v. Broomall’s Empirical Analysis

115 U.S. 429 · 1885

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
June 1940
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1940 · most notably Westinghouse Electric Manufacturing Company v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Company (1912), Grier v. Wilt (1887)

20 federal appellate · 1 district ·

601885189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Atlantio Works v. Brady Brady · Brown v. Piper · Pennsylvania Co v. Locomotive Engine Safety Truck Co · Roberts v. Ryer · Hall v. Macneale

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A comparison of the two patents requires an interpretation of the original patent in the light of the state of the art at the date when the application for it was filed. And we have the material for ascertaining its meaning in that view by means of the evidence on that point contained in the record, which, although objected to on the ground that no prior knowledge or use of the invention claimed had been specifically set up in the answer as a defense, was nevertheless admissible for the purpose of defining the limits of the grant in the original patent, and the scope of invention described in its specification.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.