Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 U.S. 579 - Arnson v. Murphy

Arnson v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis

115 U.S. 579 · 1885

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
12
cited 12 times by the Supreme Court
October 1952
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions (12 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1952 · most notably Smietanka v. Indiana Steel Co. (1921), Auffmordt v. Hedden (1890)

16 federal appellate · 8 district ·

21018851890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cheatham v. United States · Arnson v. Murphy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The statute makes the decision of the collector final and conclusive as to the rate and amount of duties, unless there is a specific protest made to the collector within ten days after the liquidation, and an appeal taken to the secretary of the treasury within thirty days after the liquidation. * * * We are of opinion that it is incumbent upon the importer to show, in order to recover, that he has fully complied with the statutory conditions which attach to the statutory action provided for. He must show not only due protest and appeal, but also a decision on the appeal. * * * But the statute sets out with declaring that the decision of the collector shall be final and conclusive against all persons interested, unless certain things are done. The mere exaction of the duties is necessarily the decision of the collector; and, on this being shown in any suit, it stands as conclusive till the plaintiff shows the proper steps to avoid it. These steps include not only protest and appeal, but the bringing of a suit within the time prescribed. They are all successively grouped together in one section, not only in section 14 of the act of 1864, but in section 2931 of the Revised Statutes; and the ‘ suit ’ spoken of in those sections is the ‘action ’ given in Rev. St. § 3011.” 115 U. S. 583 , 585, 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 185 ; Wedemeyer v. Lancaster, 30 Fed. Rep. 671 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““On the entry of any vessel or of any merchandise, the decision of the collector of customs at the port of importation and entry as to the rate and amount of duties to be paid on the tonnage of such vessel or on such merchandise, and the dutiable costs and charges thereon, shall be final and conclusive against all persons interested therein, unless the owner, master, commander, or consignee of such vessel, * * * or the owner, importer, consignee, or agent of the merchandise, in case of duties levied on merchandise, or the costs and charges thereon, shall, within ten days after the ascertainment and liquidation of the duties by the proper officers of the customs, * * * give notice in writing to the collector on each entry, if dissatisfied with his decision, setting forth therein distinctly and speci fically the grounds of his objection thereto, and shall, within thirty days after the date of such ascertainment and liquidation, appeal therefrom to the secretary of the treasury.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Shall be final, and conclusive against all persons interested in such fees, charges, or exactions, unless the like notice that an appeal will be taken from such decision to the secretary of the treasury shall be given within ten days from the making of such decision, and unless such appeal shall actually be taken within thirty days from the making of such decision; and the decision of the secretary of the treasury shall be final and conclusive upon the matter so appealed, unless suit shall be brought for the recovery of such fees, charges, or exactions within the period as provided for in the preceding section in regard to duties.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.