Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1949-04-06
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 1997
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
¶2
Both grantees testified that there had not been a manual delivery of the deed. Such being the state of the record, I see no purpose in discussing presumptions of delivery. The evidence touching on the grantor’s words and acts and the facts and circumstances preceding, attending and subsequent to the execution of the deed compel a finding of constructive delivery of the instrument with intent to convey title.
WOLFE, J., concurs for the reasons expressed by LATI-MER, J.