Levy v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1914
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably Massie v. Dudley (1939), Miller v. Bennett (1949)
2 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kimball & Fink v. Friend's Adm' r · Roller v. Murray · Richmond Traction Co. v. Clarke · Camp v. Bruce · Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Mann
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The law refuses to enforce illegal contracts as a rule, not out of regard for the party objecting, nor for any wish to protect his interests, but from reasons of public policy. Whenever, therefore, the illegality of the contract appears, whether alleged in the pleadings or made known for the first time in the evidence, it is fatal to the case. That defect cannot be gotten rid of either by a failure to plead it or by agreeing to waive it in the most solemn manner. The law will not enforce contracts founded in its violation.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dunlop v. Baker““It is a well-settled principle of law that the courts will not aid a party to enforce an agreement for the furtherance of objects forbidden by the statute, or by common law, or general policy of law, or to recover damages for its breach, or when the agreement has been executed in whole or in part by payment of money to recover it back.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dunlop v. Baker“`[w]hen a statute gives a new remedy, and contains no negative, express or implied, of the old remedy, the new one provided by it is cumulative, and the party may elect between the two.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.