Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 Wash. 2d 708 - State v. Whelchel

115 Wash. 2d 708 - State v. Whelchel’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

91
cited by 91 later decisions
4
states following
January 2021
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 84 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably State v. Roberts (2001), State v. Easter (1996)

2 federal appellate · 84 state decisions

4401990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Bruton v. United States · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Bibby v. United States · 104 Wash. 2d 412 - State v. Guloy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is reasonably possible, indeed fairly likely, that the jurors convicted only because the statements improperly admitted into evidence took away reasonable doubts which the contradictory statements in the rest of the evidence may have left in their minds.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.