Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 WIS 90 - Becker v. Chester

Becker v. Chester’s Empirical Analysis

1902

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
6
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably In re Moran's Will (1903), Lindemann v. Rusk (1905)

48 state decisions

180190219101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McArthur v. Scott · Robert v. . Corning · Roe v. . Vingut · Scott v. West · Dodge v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “, “Now we have gone over the history in this state of the subject of whether we have the common-law rule as to perpetuities respecting personalty, and have seen that, instead of a mere passing remark or individual expression of opinion by the Chief Justice in Dodge v. Williams, on the subject, we have the deliberate judgment of the court, estab-”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““We adopt the doctrine that the absolute power of alienation is not suspended within the meaning of the statute so long as absolute power is located somewhere to alienate, regardless of the condition in which the equivalent of the property alienated may be left.” Becker v. Chester (1902), 115 Wis. 90, 115 , 91 N. W. 87 , 91 N. W. 650 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““There can be no question but the statute refers to real estate alone. It may, however, admit of doubt whether the remark of the Chief Justice is strictly accurate in saying that it abolishes the common rule of perpetuities as to personalty when applied to private trusts.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.