In re Max M.’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Santosky v. Kramer · In Re Robert S. · In Re Amber P. · In Re Jazlyn P. · In Re Natalya C.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“are accorded great weight on appeal and will not be disturbed unless it can be shown that they are clearly wrong or [that] the trial justice overlooked or misconceived material evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re James H.“due process requires that, before the state may terminate a parent's rights in his or her children, the state must support its allegations by clear and convincing evidence .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re James H.“a parent's lack of interest in his or her child evidenced by an unwillingness to cooperate with DCYF services can be a basis for a finding of unfitness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re James H.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.