Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 Ariz. 255 - Mason v. Wilson

Mason v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
5
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2008 · most notably In Re Krohn (2002), Peterson v. Montana Bank of Bozeman, NA (1984)

26 state decisions

1201977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Fuentes v. Shevin · North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc. · Schroeder v. City of New York · Nussbaumer v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF YUMA

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"A court may order an execution sale set aside on the basis of two grounds: First, the purchase price received at the sheriff's sale may be so inadequate as to shock the conscience of the court and justify setting aside the sale, Nussbaumer [v. Superior Court In and For County of Yuma, 107 Ariz. 504 , 489 P.2d 843 (1971)], supra; Wiesel v. Ashcraft, 26 Ariz.App. 490 , 549 P.2d 585 (1976). Second, where there is an inadequacy of price which in itself might not be grounds for setting aside the sale, slight additional circumstances or matters of equity may so justify."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The general rule that emerges from Mullane is that notice by publication is not enough with respect to a person whose name and address are known or very easily ascertainable and whose legally protected interests are directly affected by the proceedings in question.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]here there is an inadequacy of price which in itself might not be grounds for setting aside the sale, slight additional circumstances or matters of equity may so justify.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.