State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2007
2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · Irvin v. Dowd · Sheppard v. Maxwell · Estes v. Texas · North Carolina Natural Gas Corp. v. McJunkin Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Furthermore, a change of venue is not required unless the defendant can demonstrate that the publicity has reached the jury panel and that jurors both have formed and are unable to lay aside preconceived notions regarding the defendant’s guilt. State v. Endreson, 109 Ariz. 117 , 506 P.2d 248 (1973).” State v. Smith, supra, 116 Ariz. at 390 , 569 P.2d at 820 . See also State v. Gretzler, 126 Ariz. 60 , 612 P.2d 1023 (No. 3750, filed 21 April 1980); State v. Lacquey, 117 Ariz. 231 , 571 P.2d 1027 (1977); Northern California Pharmaceutical Association v. United States, 306 F.2d 379 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 371 U.S. 862 , 83 S.Ct. 119 , 9 L.Ed.2d 99 (1962).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mulligan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.