Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 Ariz. 522 - Olson v. Neale

Olson v. Neale’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 2012

12 state decisions

6019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 47 Cal. 2d 62 - Pac. Etc. Dev. Corp. v. Western Pac. RR Co. · Garver v. Thoman · 18 Ariz. App. 368 - Gray v. Kohlhase · Fornara v. Wolpe · Fink v. Williamson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No action shall be brought in any court in the following cases unless the promise or agreement upon which the action is brought, or some memorandum thereof, is in writing and signed by the party to be charged, or by some person by him thereunto lawfully authorized: 7. Upon an agreement authorizing or employing an agent or broker to purchase or sell real property, or mines, for compensation or a commission.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““. .. the public policy of this State is that brokers, in order to collect a commission, must have a written listing, that the listing must contain a definite expiration date, and the listing agreement shall be deemed to cancel automatically on that date.” Id. at 525 , 570 P.2d at 212 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.