In Re Blaise’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2010
3 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 326 · 11 U.S.C. § 330 · 11 U.S.C. § 547 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Doan v. Hudgins · Stinson v. Williamson · Lucius v. McLemore · Andermahr v. Barrus (In Re Andermahr) · Hardage v. Herring National Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is great unfairness in having a trustee diligently take charge of assets not claimed as exempt and reduce the asset to cash, expending considerable time, effort and expense in the process. Then, when the case would be otherwise distributed to the creditors, the debtor seeks to amend his exemptions to claim the benefits of the trustee’s work, without bearing the burden of the trustee’s efforts.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Fournier“may be amended by the debtor as a matter of course at any time before the case is closed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Calder v. Job
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.