Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 Cal. App. 170 - Tufts v. Mann

116 Cal. App. 170 - Tufts v. Mann’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
7
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently January 2014 · most notably Hayes v. Muller (1963), 28 Cal. 2d 214 - Rattray v. Scudder (1946)

28 state decisions

110193119401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lomita Land and Water Co. v. Robinson · 43 Cal. App. 1 - Keyes v. Nims · Munson v. Fishburn · 42 Cal. App. 81 - Menefee v. Oxnam · Smith v. Blodget

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The plaintiffs, in effect, gave to the defendant an option for five days to endeavor to sell the block of land for whatever sum it could obtain, and upon whatever terms it might make, provided they should receive therefor the sum of $10,000, and agreed that defendant should have whatever sum it could realize therefor above that amount. The relation thus created between them was rather that of a vendor and purchaser under a contract of sale than one of principal and agent, and a sale by the defendant thereunder was in the capacity of a vendor upon its own account, and not for the account of the plaintiffs."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““An option is' an agreement by which an owner invests another with the exclusive right to buy certain property at a stipulated price, within a limited time ... It is apparent that respondent held an option and right to purchase the property in question, and that such option was not merely a listing with authorization to sell the property as agent for the owner.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Joint adventurers in the purchase and sale of property must act in the highest good faith toward each other and may not make any secret profits out of the transaction not shared by the others.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.