Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 CALAPP2D 431 - Muller v. Martin

Muller v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
November 2005
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 2005

9 state decisions

40195319601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Capuccio v. Caire · Cheney v. Ricks · 87 Cal. App. 538 - Libby v. Kipp · 62 Cal. App. 6 - Chavez v. Scully · Girtman v. Starbuck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In making this analysis of plaintiff's computations, we are not holding that there is any fixed percentage or range of percentages for use as a formula in determining the reasonableness of fees to be paid for services [in partition and sale-for-division cases]. The real question is the reasonable worth or value of the services rendered. The ratio that sum bears to the total value of the property involved will naturally vary as the conditions and circumstances attending the partition and sale vary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.