Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 CALAPP2D 533 - People v. Carter

People v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
October 1969
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 30 Cal. 2d 676 - People v. Eggers · People v. Willard · 14 Cal. App. 576 - People v. Ruef · People v. Fitzgerald · People v. Kromphold

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““However, as pointed out by respondent, identification is a matter for jury determination, and the record shows that the identification of appellant by both Lane and Perez at the trial was without qualification. Any want of positiveness would go only to the weight of the testimony and the question was one for the jury to determine.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.