Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

116 Cal. App. 2d 913

In re Sweeden

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1953

California Court of Appeal · decided 1953-03-24

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1957

2 state decisions

Relies on In Re Davis · 116 Cal. App. 2d 891 - People v. Sweeden

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1953-03-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

THE COURT.

¶1Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus, alleging generally the same facts related in People v. Jimmie Sweeden, Jr., Crim No. 937, ante, p. 891 [254 P.2d 899], this day decided. He here cites the same authorities and advances the same reasons there advanced as grounds for his release under this writ. He expresses the claim that the trial court acted arbitrarily in revoking his probation order.

¶2The contentions here made are sufficiently discussed and fully answered in that case. In addition, In re Davis, 37 Cal.2d 872 [236 P.2d 579], holds that the validity of such an order, when reviewed by habeas corpus, should first be sought from the revoking court.

¶3*914I

/116/calapp2d/913 · .json · Public domain