116 Cal. App. 4th 182 - Moore v. Shaw’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
60 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 29 Cal. 4th 53 - Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc. · 29 Cal. 4th 82 - Navellier v. Sletten · 19 Cal. 4th 1106 - Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & Opportunity · 29 Cal. 4th 69 - City of Cotati v. Cashman · 24 Cal. 4th 1122 - Ketchum v. Moses
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“award costs and reasonable attorney's fees to a plaintiff prevailing on the motion, pursuant to [s]ection 128.5.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“A determination of frivolousness requires a finding ... that any reasonable attorney would agree [the anti-SLAPP] motion is totally devoid of merit.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'a court must use the procedures and apply the substantive standards of section 128.5 in deciding whether to award attorney fees under the anti-SLAPP statute.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.