Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 Conn. 448 - Starr v. Watrous

Starr v. Watrous’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
13
states following
September 1999
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently September 1999 · most notably Baylor v. National Bank of Commerce (1952), Jerome v. Jerome (1952)

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 40 state decisions — followed in 13 states

1201933194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Matter of City of Rochester · Sherman v. Moore · Peck v. Botsford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “I direct that all my just debts, funeral expenses, succession and other taxes be paid by my executors hereinafter named. . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “in general, all that is required is that the will sufficiently express an intent that the tax shall be paid out of the estate of the testator other than the property passing to the recipient as donee, beneficiary, or distributee. A natural and appropriate method of accomplishing this purpose is to provide for payment of the tax in like manner as debts of the estate and funeral expenses, the result of this course being that the tax ultimately comes out of the residuary estate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““If the testatrix had merely directed that her debts, funeral expenses, and taxes be paid by her executors, without specific mention of succession taxes, the provision doubtless would be construed as referring only to taxes which are ordinarily payable out of the estate as are other debts of the testatrix and, as in Jones Estate, 12 Pa. Dist. R. 83, not expressing with sufficient clearness an intention to include taxes normally payable out of the several legacies.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.