Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 Conn. 58 - Marks Appeal From Probate

Marks Appeal From Probate’s Empirical Analysis

1932

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
December 1997
most recently cited

2 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 1997

2 district · 13 state decisions

601932194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hall v. Meriden Trust & Safe Deposit Co. · Johnson's Appeal from Probate · Mulcahy v. Mulcahy · Fairman's Appeal from Probate · Mallory's Appeal From Probate

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may do so at the risk of being charged with any loss involved. . . . The purpose of the statute is to enable them to obviate this contingency by obtaining approval in advance.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 430 - Commissioner v. Estate of Centeno, No. Cv 90 0267115 S (Jan. 30, 1991) · 1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 13073 - State v. Saunders, No. Cv95 32 09 99 S (Dec. 16, 1997)
  2. “[E]xecutors and administrators do not lack power to make such compromises without court authority”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 430 - Commissioner v. Estate of Centeno, No. Cv 90 0267115 S (Jan. 30, 1991) · 1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 13073 - State v. Saunders, No. Cv95 32 09 99 S (Dec. 16, 1997)

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.