Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 F.1d 435 - In re Rogers

In re Rogers’s Empirical Analysis

116 F. 435 · 1902

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 1932
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1932

1 federal appellate · 3 district ·

201902191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the assets are delivered to the trustee by tjae receiver of the state court, this court will consider any application for compensation which may be made by officers of the state court, and; if allowable, will grant suitable compensation.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.