Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 F.1d 49 - Fenno v. Primrose

Fenno v. Primrose’s Empirical Analysis

116 F. 49 · 1902

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
December 1906
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Root v. Railway Co. · William Fowle v. James Lawrason's Executor Apellee · Fowle v. Lawrason's Executor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The language of the statute is comprehensive, and in terms gives this court jurisdiction in equity in all cases where an account is to be settled which cannot he conveniently settled in an action of assumpsit, whether in such cases an action of account would lie before the statute or not. And this construction of the statute would not give to the court a more ample jurisdiction than courts of equity have in England, where a bill for an account is sustained in many cases in which an action of account would not lie.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.