Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 F.2d 1001 - McAbee v. Isom

McAbee v. Isom’s Empirical Analysis

116 F.2d 1001 · 1940

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 3 U.S.C. § 103

Relies on Keppel v. Tiffin Savings Bank · Page v. Rogers · Hill v. Harding · Barks v. Kleyne · 29 F. Supp. 293 - In Re Skidmore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It thus appears that a claim proven as a secured claim is always potentially an unsecured one. If the security fails in whole or in part the equity of the case will generally require that recognition be given the unsecured debt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.