Farris v. Interstate Circuit, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
116 F.2d 409 · 1941
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently September 2006 · most notably United States v. Amaral (1973), United States v. Antonelli Fireworks Co. (1946)
25 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gunning v. Cooley · Milwaukee and Saint Paul Railway Company v. Kellogg · United States v. Spaulding · Fillippon v. Albion Vein Slate Co. · McCandless v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The theory upon which expert testimony is excepted from the opinion evidence rule is that such testimony serves to inform the court [and jury] about affairs not within the full understanding of the average man.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.