Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 F.2d 43 - Puente v. Spanish Nat. State

Puente v. Spanish Nat. State’s Empirical Analysis

116 F.2d 43 · 1940

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
November 2012
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently November 2012 · most notably Wacker v. Bisson (1965), Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran (2010)

16 federal appellate · 5 district ·

10019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on David Kawananakoa v. Ellen Albertina Polyblank · Porto Rico v. Rosaly y Castillo · The Navemar Compania Espanola De Navegacion Maritima Sa v. The Navemar · In re Muir · The Pesaro

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a court appears to have all the elements of jurisdiction of an action, it is not improper to require of even a sovereign who would oust it of that jurisdiction that he furnish due proof to support his claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that under prevailing principles of international law the Spanish Government as a Sovereign State is not subject to suit in your Court without its consent, which in this case it declines to accord.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “how the conceded immunity of a friendly foreign state from suit without its consent is to be presented to a court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.