Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 F.2d 49 - In re Perlman

In re Perlman’s Empirical Analysis

116 F.2d 49 · 1940

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
September 2009
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2009

14 federal appellate · 2 district ·

701940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Syracuse Engineering Co. v. Haight · Hunter v. Commerce Trust Co. · Zimmerman v. Eden · In re Perlman · In re Hopkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whenever it appears they were closed before being fully administered,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “What constitutes `cause' is not defined and lies primarily within the discretion of the district judge; only for plain abuse of discretion should his decision be reversed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.