United States v. Layman’s Empirical Analysis
116 F.3d 105 · 1997
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably United States v. Goodwyn (2010), United States of America v. Norma Burgos-Andjar
28 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jusino v. Brown · Sobin v. United States · United States v. Cook · United States v. Fletcher · United States v. Clay
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). In this case, the judgment of conviction was not entered until after the resentencing hearing, so the only sentence shown on that written judgment included the corrections made at the resentencing hearing. If Appellant's sentence was not imposed for purposes of Rule 35(c) until the written judgment was entered, there would be only one sentence-the one pronounced at the resentencing hearing-and the district court would have no need for Rule 35(c) authority. Although Rule 35(c) authority is jurisdictional, see Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 advisory committee's note (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“could simply delay the ministerial task of filing a judgment, thereby providing the court an indefinite period of time in which to change its mind about the sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“equivalency ratio ... applies to all offenses involving the growing of marijuana....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.