United States v. Calloway’s Empirical Analysis
116 F.3d 1129 · 1997
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2017 · most notably United States v. Webb (2005), United States v. Barnett (2005)
34 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 49 U.S.C. § 46502 · 49 U.S.C. § 46504
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Olano · Illinois v. Gates · Payton v. New York · Johnson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'Current law,' for purposes of plain error review, is the law as it exists at the time of review”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“and began attacking the crew with a hammer”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.