David v. McDonald’s Empirical Analysis
116 F.3d 1146 · 1997
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
January 2005
most recently cited
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · United States v. W. T. Grant Co. · Honig v. Doe · Green v. Mansour
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]re in need of specialized services including, but not limited to child welfare, mental health and education.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to provide services to children over the age of 13 who ha[d] been adjudicated `delinquent.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in Illinois means crime. 705 ILCS 405/5-3(1). Acts that lead to this designation run the gamut from vehicular hijacking to sexual assault to murder. Confronted with potentially inconsistent obligations under the statute and the consent decree, the DCFS asked ... to be relieved of any duty to provide services to delinquents over the age of 13. 3 David B. v. McDonald, 116 F.3d 1146, 1147 (7th Cir.1997). After the district judge denied the agency's request, we remanded so that the court could determine whether the case is within federal jurisdiction and, if it is, whether”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. David v. McDonald
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.