Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 F.3d 1243 - United States v. Cabrera

United States v. Cabrera’s Empirical Analysis

116 F.3d 1243 · 1997

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
June 2021
most recently cited

35 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably United States v. Bass (1997), United States v. Adams (2005)

35 federal appellate ·

2101997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Lee v. Brown · G-K Development Co. v. Broadmoor Place Investments · Webster v. Reproductive Health Services · United States v. Ivey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only establish a tacit understanding between the parties, and this may be shown wholly through the circumstantial evidence of [the defendant's] actions.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We review de novo the sufficiency of the evidence and view that evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, giving it the benefit of all reasonable inferences. We reverse only if no reasonable jury could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. We do not weigh the evidence or the credibility of the witnesses. Rather the jury has sole responsibility for resolving conflicts or contradictions in testimony, and we must resolve credibility issues in favor of the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[B]ecause the nature of conspiracy entails secrecy, the agreement and members' participation in it must often be established by way of inference from the surrounding circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.