Crump v. Caspari’s Empirical Analysis
116 F.3d 326 · 1997
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2012
12 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Estelle v. McGuire · Hill v. United States · Frey v. Leapley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in a complete miscarriage of justice, [or] an omission inconsistent with rudimentary demands of a fair trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. No. 98-2449
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.