Binford v. Rhode’s Empirical Analysis
116 F.3d 396 · 1997
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2016
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Anders v. California · Coleman v. Thompson · Rose v. Lundy · Castille v. Peoples · Tacho v. Martinez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“they are not barred from ultimate federal review, but first must be exhausted in state court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Shumway v. Payne
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.