Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 F.3d 442 - United States v. Hogan

United States v. Hogan’s Empirical Analysis

116 F.3d 442 · 1997

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
April 2010
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2010

9 federal appellate ·

60199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113

Relies on Stinson v. United States · National Educational Support Systems, Inc. v. Autoskill, Inc. · Lindsay v. Beneficial Reinsurance Co. · In re Geschke · United States v. Farnsworth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]e must consider the robbery note or threat as a whole and not as unconnected individual statements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.