Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

116 F.3d 482

Docket No. 96-35396.

Atkinson

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued and Submitted: June 3, 1997. June 13, 1997.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Relies on Brown v. Day

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, No. CV-94-05600-FDB; Franklin D. Burgess, United States District Judge, Presiding Seattle, Washington

Before: WRIGHT, PREGERSON, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

¶1

ORDER*

¶2

We have carefully reviewed the record in this case and have considered the arguments of counsel. We find no error.

¶3

AFFIRMED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

/116/f3d/482 · .json · Public domain