United States v. Reyes’s Empirical Analysis
116 F.3d 67 · 1997
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3558 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · United States v. Rosa · United States v. Rivera · United States v. Zackson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“) (citing Connecticut Nat'l Bank v. Germain, 503 U.S. 249 , 253-54, 112 S.Ct. 1146, 1149-50, 117 L.Ed.2d 391 (1992)), Impressa has failed to demonstrate”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Buti v. Perosa“When the language of a statute is unambiguous, ... the judicial inquiry ends....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Buti v. Perosa
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.