United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
116 F.3d 857 · 1997
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably United States v. Lee (2004), United States v. Mendoza (1997)
18 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bailey v. United States · County of Contra Costa v. Visness · United States v. Lang · United States v. Webb · United States v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“constitutes a sentencing package which takes into account all counts upon which the defendant has been convicted”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.