United States v. Simpson’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on United States v. Olano · Blakely v. Washington · Blockburger v. United States · Crawford v. Washington · Bruton v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. at 1364 (emphasis added). But here, because the statements exculpated Bowers, rather than incriminated him, they cannot be said to have been used against him nor to have prejudiced him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Nor does Crawford v. Washington , 541 U.S. 36 , 158 L.Ed.2d 177 , 124 S. Ct. 1354 (2004), change our analysis. In Crawford , the Supreme Court emphasized that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[N]o term of imprisonment imposed on a person under this subsection shall run concurrently with any other term of imprisonment imposed on the person....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. U.S. v. Jackson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.