Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

116 Fla. 55

156 So 317

Shisler v. Curtis

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 31, 1934

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1934-07-31

Relies on State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1934-07-31

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 2000

11 state decisions

3019341940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1 In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Davis, Mr. Justice Terrell and Mr. Justice Brown are of the opinion that the judgment in this cause should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice Ellis and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that the said judgment should be reversed. When members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the judgment should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered, and adjudged under the authority of State, ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the judgment of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

¶2 Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
/116/fla/55 · .json · Public domain