Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 FRD 211 - Real v. Continental Group, Inc.

Real v. Continental Group, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

4 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 2013

4 district · 2 state decisions

601986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Blum v. Stenson · Ed. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., a Corporation, Richard A. Perkins, Counsel for Ed Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., a Corporation, H. O'Neil Shanks, and Norman Stevans, Richard A. Perkins, Counsel For · Phaksuan v. United States · Schofield v. United States

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.