Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 FSUPP2D 210 - United States v. Khalaf

United States v. Khalaf’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
February 2020
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2020

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

501999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United State v. Morgan · Mempa v. Rhay · Dade County v. Lake Lucerne Civic Ass'n · Dade County v. Lake Lucerne Civic Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]n attorney has a duty to research the applicable law and to advise his client in such a way as to allow him to make informed choices, when the attorney undertakes to represent a criminal defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a defendant must allege and demonstrate that his counsel's error clearly resulted from neglect or ignorance, rather than from informed professional deliberation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.