Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 Idaho 185 - State v. Sindak

State v. Sindak’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2012

17 state decisions

1201989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · State v. Hobson · State v. Stuart · State v. Gabrielson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court, unless good cause to the contrary is shown, must order the prosecution or indictment dismissed in the following cases: 3. If a defendant, charged with a misdemeanor offense, whose trial has not been postponed upon his application, is not brought to trial within six (6) months from the date that the defendant enters plea of not guilty with the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.