Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 Idaho 827 - State v. Whitehawk

State v. Whitehawk’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1991
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Toohill · State v. Reinke · State v. Nice · State v. Adams · State v. Pearson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “MR. SCHLENDER: Your Honor, I think possibly we should add at this time that the plea of guilty is entered into pursuant to a stipulation and agreement so that it isn’t a guilty plea without the background of negotiations with the prosecuting attorney, and we do have a written agreement prepared. MR. BOOMER: I have some proposed modifications to that, I think they’re consistent with our understanding, but I should get those on the record, too, Your Honor. THE COURT: Let’s do that now. MR. BOOMER: I take it the Court has a copy of the — or perhaps the original of the proposed agreement entitled I.C.R. Stipulation and Agreement; Plea and Sexxtencing? THE COURT: It’s in the file here somewhere I suppose. MR. BOOMER: Here’s a copy, Your Honor, (handing to the court). THE COURT: Thank you. MR. BOOMER: Your Honor, I guess before we proceed any further I would like to propose the following changes: Paragraph 3, Page 2, minor technical change, the code section cited there, 18-6607, has been amended to Idaho Code 18-1508. The old code for this charge used to be 6607, it’s now 1508. THE COURT: Do you have any objection to that amendment? MR. SCHLENDER: None, Your Hon- or. MR. BOOMER: Also, in Paragraph 8, Your Honor, where it says that if the Court determines upon consideration of the sentencing report and any reports submitted to the Court concerning mental condition that the defendant presents a risk of danger to the public at large, I’m okay up to those words, but I think the additio”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.