Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 Ill. 2d 413 - Walker v. Hardiman

116 Ill. 2d 413 - Walker v. Hardiman’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 1999
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 35 Ill. App. 3d 26 - People Ex Rel. Rogers v. Elrod · 55 Ill. 2d 1 - People Ex Rel. Millet v. Woods · 115 Ill. App. 3d 1 - People v. Ripa · 77 Ill. App. 3d 227 - People v. Walker · 140 Ill. App. 3d 946 - Walker v. Hardiman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In consideration of the said principal’s release, the undersigned as principal and surety, respectively, covenant and agree: % ;Jc * ■ 2. That the said principal shall * * * E If the judgment is affirmed or the cause reversed and remanded for a new trial, forthwith surrender to the officer from whose custody he/she was released.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]hether counsel for petitioner and the petitioner, who had been admitted to bail, had notice of the issuance of the mandate so as to have established an affirmative duty on petitioner to surrender in compliance with section 110-10(b)(5) of the Code of Criminal Procedure***.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We also believe that our decision in this case will now make it clear that once the State moves to have the appellate court mandate spread of record in the circuit court, and the defendant is so notified, any delay in surrendering will be attributable to the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.