116 Ill. App. 3d 430 - People v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently January 2026 · most notably 179 Ill. 2d 367 - Best v. Taylor MacHine Works (1997), State v. Schultz (1993)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Cooper v. State of California · Oklahoma Press Pub Co v. Walling US News Printing Co · United States v. Miller · Wells v. Simonds Abrasive Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Illinois Constitution offers protection for the reasonable expectation of privacy which our citizens have in their bank records.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated * * *." (Ill. Const. 1870, art. II, § 6.)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The statute by its terms only tries to set out the obligations which a bank owes to its bank customers. These are the obligations of confidentiality and the obligation of notice to a customer if this confidentiality is abridged. The statute does not attempt to regulate governmental intrusion into a customer’s confidential bank records.” (Emphasis added.) Jackson, 116 Ill. App. 3d at 437 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.