116 Ind. App. 106 - Sharp v. Grip Nut Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1945
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 1991
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boone v. Lightner · Ferrara v. Genduso · 104 Ind. App. 387 - Kuhn v. Indiana Ice & Fuel Co. · 69 Ohio App. 447 - Shaffer v. Shaffer · Sharp v. Moffitt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is well settled and no authority is needed for the proposition, that an appearance in a suit or action for any purpose other than one to test the jurisdiction of the court, or the sufiiciency and service of a process, is- a •general appearance. The filing of an affidavit bearing on the contention that ■defendant was at that time engaged in the military service of the United States, was certainly pot an appearance having anything to do with the jurisdiction of the court to try the action, or one having any bearing whatever on the legality of the service. * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.