Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 116 Ind. App. 310 - Heavin v. Sutherlin

116 Ind. App. 310 - Heavin v. Sutherlin’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1967
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. Perkins · Dearing v. Coulson · 86 Ind. App. 79 - Christman, Admr. v. Hack · Ebersole v. Redding

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The present statute, however, expressly provides for the review of the discretion exercised by the trial court, and it becomes the duty of the court on appeal to examine into the circumstances under which the discretion was exercised. It has been held that every case, wherein the discretion has been exercised, must necessarily be determined on its own merits, and no general rule that would be applicable in all cases can be laid down.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . That, in all cases referred to in section two hundred and seventy six (§2-1715), . . . any party to such suit shall have the right to call and examine any party adverse to him as a witness, or the court may, in its discretion, require any party to a suit or other person to testify, and any abuse of such discretion shall be reviewable on appeal.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.